« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

My short answer to today's panel question: Never forget why women are the power users of Web 2.0

I don't expect today's Netsquared panel to be the usual de rigeur nod to gender. Just look at the line-up: Catherine Geanuracos of Momsrising, Christine Herron of the Omidyar Foundation and Fran Maier of TrustE. We will be "immoderated" by Susan Mernit, who knows a little something about the topic, to say the least.

The question we're addressing is "Gender and the Social Web: New tools, same...stuff?" Key to the discussion is following paragraph, which appears to define "stuff":

"Technology in general has a history of male dominance. Will there be anything different in the proliferation of tools and expressions that constitute the social web? Are there ways that the social space around new web tools can be articulated by new actors with a new vision of equitable interaction?"

The short answer: Never forget why women are the power users of Web 2.0.

Contrary to so many presentations I've seen about women's use of social media -- from email to message boards to IM to blogs -- it's not just because we love to talk.

It's because women also love to listen.

Asking questions and listening to the answers is the key to BlogHer's success as a community thus far -- and we are just the tip of iceberg. (Hint: Check out the blogs in our blogrolls and watch where the action is, where the comments are.) As I said when Elisa, Jory and I first started working together 15 months ago: How do you overthrow the dominant hierarchy? You give up control. And when it comes to leadership, the first step in giving up control is to listen. That's how people who use the social web can continue to grow an innovate new models of leadership -- in technology, in politics and in operations.

The long answer: Women are not only the majority of Web users - women are the power Web 2.0 users. "New tools same...stuff?" If "stuff" means the same old lack of female representation in technology leadership (from boardrooms to conferences) and in parts of society now being dramatically affected by technology (say, the entire publishing world) the answer is no, don't expect the same old stuff - unless women choose to tolerate that answer. That is the challenge -- what do individual women want and whether and if they will take personal responsbility to make that happen.

But before I go there, I want to dig into the women-as-power-Web 2.0-user reality. It's not that women have changed. It's that technology has finally equipped us with tools we can fit into our lives and our communication styles as never before. Whether we're breastfeeding or taking care of aging parents or trying to do all of the above while traveling for work, the Internet is our friend. The email metaphor extends throughout social media -- it's essential lives, essential ticking through our massive to-do lists. Blogging technology has finally granted us the ability to, essentially, create automatic, contextual, one-to-many email communiques with existing and likely future simpatica women online.

Note my emphasis on communication. Communication does not just mean talking, or pushing words or audio or video at people. Communication also requires listening. Listening requires synthesizing, absorbing, asking, poking at, dissecting and learning. That's what women are doing with the social web.

That's the secret sauce driving astonishing new numbers on women's social media use by the likes of Nielsen Net Ratings, Perseus Development Corp., WOW!, and eMarketer. Even the classically rather behind and buttoned up Pew Center recently used the word "voracious" to describe women's communication habits online:

“Women are more voracious online communicators…Women are catching up to men in most measures of online life. Men like the Internet for the experiences …while women like it for the human connections it promotes.” Source: Pew | Internet, “How Women and Men Use the Internet,” 12.05

All the sources listed above paint a single picture--and I'll use a very foreign, male word: Online dominance...

  • Women already outnumber men online in the U.S. – among marrieds, people with kids at home and in every age category but 65+
  • Women are equally as likely as men to “Read a blog,” and “Create a blog”
  • Women write between 43% and 56% of blogs
  • Women command a large share of blog visitors
  • Women continue to control 83 % of household spending.

That last fact--that women control 83 cents of every household dollar spent in the United States--hasn't changed in a decade, since before I wrote my first Women.com presentation.

But in the face of a splintering traditional media model and abdicating advertisers, the spending power of women has gained the attention of appropriately concerned publishers whose airwaves and op-ed pages have been dominated by men for as long as they've been in operation. And guess what they're doing?

They're listening.

So now the question comes back to us: Okay, wired women, what kind of world do you want to live and work in? How much "stuff" will women tolerate before we abandon the offending parties and do our own thing? Will we operate our own op-ed pages or stay off them, as Amy Sullivan wondered last year? Will we run for office or run from the polls? And when we do our own thing -- be it BlogHer or Momsrising or venture capital or online personals -- how can we continue to innovate in our style of leadership? How can we remember to just...keep...listening?

Tags: , TechSoup, Community, Blogging, Blogging, Blogs, Women, Weblogs,

Bloggers: Our First Amendment rights have been confirmed. Let's exercise them.

I see from Dan Gillmor, Denise Howell and many others that the latest ruling in Apple v. Does confirms the California Shield Law for journalists extends to bloggers.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation takes appropriate credit for its role:

"Huge Win for Online Journalists' Source Protection
"A California state appeals court ruled in favor of the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF's) petition on behalf of three online journalists Friday, holding that the online journalists have the same right to protect the confidentiality of their sources as offline reporters do. "Today's decision is a victory for the rights of journalists, whether online or offline, and for the public at large," said EFF Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl, who argued the case before the appeals court last month. "The court has upheld the strong protections for the free flow of information to the press, and from the press to the public." Full story, For the full decision in the case [PDF], For more on Apple v. Does "

What does this mean for you and me? Here's an excerpt from Denise's terrific write-up, and you should really read the whole thing:

[Update:] The California shield law compels a protective order. "The shield law is intended to protect the gathering and dissemination of news, and that is what petitioners did here." "Acts of journalism" indeed:

We can think of no workable test or principle that would distinguish 'legitimate' from 'illegitimate' news. Any attempt by courts to draw such a distinction would imperil a fundamental purpose of the First Amendment, which is to identify the best, most important, and most valuable ideas not by any sociological or economic formula, rule of law, or process of government, but through the rough and tumble competition of the memetic marketplace.

The court rejected Apple's argument that publishing "verbatim copies" of internal information cannot constitute legitimate journalism because it assertedly involves "no editorial oversight:" "The shield exists not only to protect editors but equally if not more to protect newsgatherers. The primacy Apple would grant to editorial function cannot be justified by any rationale known to us." Moreover, it should be self-evident in the digital age that simply deciding what to publish is indeed an editorial act (note this court gets the impact of attention on journalism)..." more

Denise also recommends Eugene Volokh on the journalist's privilege portions of the decision.

Be aware that you still need to know your rights and may need to step carefully in your home state: American journalists in all media still lack the protection of a national shield law, which is how reporters regularly end up in jail. That's the next step. For history on this issue, see the First Amendment Center.

Related links from Surfette:

  • Think different: Journalists, read the bloggers' amicus brief in Apple v. Does
  • Apple v. Does: Bloggers file amicus brief

Tags: , , , , , ,

"When a coalition includes ninjas, anything is possible..."

That headline belongs to Laura Scott (pingVision, rare pattern), who has done a terrific job covering the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2006. Here's her lede:

"When a coalition includes ninjas, anything is possible

"It's not very often that you see MoveOn.org, the Christian Coalition, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the Gun Owners of America, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, the American Library Association, and Craig Newmark of Craigslist on the same side of the political fences. (Where's the ninja? Read on....)"
For anyone who missed Laura's previous posts on this topic, check out:
  • Because the phrase "net neutrality" doesn't blast off the screen
  • "Net Neutrality" under siege

    I love how Ben Scott nails the central issue. Looks like he and Moby have done their part. And, to your point, it even looks as though the House may do the right thing. But as Public Knowledge notes at the end of that link, "It’s a little early to tell what will happen in the House now. In the past, when Judiciary and Commerce have passed separate bills, the Rules Committee got the unenviable task of figuring out how to deal with the competing interests."

    If you care about this issue, here's a great place to email your representatives.

    I also have to thank Laura for linking my 10-year-old's fave ninja site. This guy kills me. I'll be the one at BlogHer in a pair of black pyjamas, karate-chopping my way toward the drinks with the little umbrellas...

  • Acquired? Or Expired? You know who you are...

    This link brought to you in honor of all the former Women.commies I'm seeing at tonight's reunion:

    Acquired? Or Expired?

    Ah, names from yesteryear. Webvan. Boo. Kozmo. Pets.com.

    George Santayana said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." So...with all of the Web 2.0 hype currently happening, let's see what lessons we learned from the dot-com boom of the late 90's. Here are 25 companies that were dot-com darlings but are no longer with us. Can you tell if they were...Acquired or Expired?

    Take the quiz.

    I'm embarrassed to say that Valleywag scored higher than I...

    Tags:  web 2.0, web2.0, Ajax, technology, Web, Internet, Tech, Blogging, Google.

    What do Arianna Huffington, Caroline Little, Meg Hourihan, Mena Trott, Grace Davis, Chris Nolan and Marnie Webb have in common?

    This: BlogHer, the Web’s Number-One Guide to Women Bloggers, Announces Keynote Speakers for BlogHer Conference ‘06. What is BlogHer '06? Here's the short list:

    Attendees: 750

    Cocktail parties: 2

    Swimming pools: 1

    Worlds to collide and change: Infinite

    This is going to be fun. And if you haven't bought your ticket yet, I beseech you, please do now. Day One already is sold out.

    And, by the way, I officially owe a huge thank you to Guy Kawasaki. Thanks to Guy, BlogHer is now working with Barbara Krause and Betty Taylor of Krause Taylor. Which is how my partner Elisa Camahort had time today to work on some of the seventeen kazillion burning priorities on her plate.

    Next time, Guy, we're buying breakfast.

    Tags: , Bloghercon, Blogging, Blogs, Women, Weblogs, dailyblogher, Partners,

    Updated: BlogHer Ad Network launches

    This morning, my partners Elisa Camahort, Jory Des Jardins and I announced the BlogHer Ad Network in partnership with two dozen incredible moms who blog. Here are the links, followed by our intro below:

    Introducing a new way for advertisers to jump-start a conversation with the most influential women on the Internet: Women bloggers and their readers.

    BeTwinnedChookooloonksMommybloggersBusy MomIzzyMom

    BlogHer LLC, the number-one guide to women bloggers, invites sponsors to join the BlogHer Ad Network and support women who blog...

    You have to visit the first link to see every blog -- and there will be more, as we say in our letter. I think it's exciting and important that we add economic empowerment to our mission. More from me on this topic soon...

    Eager to hear your thoughts!

    Update: Here's some media coverage...

    Tags: , Bloghercon, Blogging, Blogs, Women, Weblogs, dailyblogher, Partners, News, technology, Journalism, Internet, Blogging, Marketing

    Remember "Step 1: No more rookie maneuvers"? Here's how NYTD can avoid delivering Exhibit C.

    "Can Newspapers Do Blogs Right?" asked Robert Niles of me three weeks ago. "Of course," I snapped at him, "As long as they follow three rules. Step 1: No more rookie maneuvers..."

    Today the New York Times appears to be wavering at a decision point. Either,

    1. NYTD is about to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by pro-actively working in beta with the blog community on a new local politics blog, or

    2. NYTD just delivered Step 1, Exhibit C in the Rookie Maneuvers Department I describe above. For those of you who aren't following daly newspaper blog use with the same geeky interest, Exhibit A was Ben Domenench at the Washington Post, followed by Exhibit B, the Los Angeles Times/Michael Hiltzik event.

    Here's the scoop: Today, Gotham politico (and BlogHer correspondent) Liza Sabater of Culture Kitchen posted this entry: "Exclusive Blind Item: The blauxg pas edition." Great story -- like any good geek, Sabater apparently reads her referral logs. In so doing, she came across an as-yet unreleased NYT blog on local politics that links to the terrific grassroots politics blog Sabater developed, The Gothamist. Here's the kicker: While the NYT blog isn't publicly launched or linked from http://nytimes.com, Sabater was able to log in, post, and warn the editors that they had not secured the site and she could do damage. Her graphic tells it all:

    Read Liza's letter to the developers of this blog here.

    Here's what the NYTD team should do next: Pick door number 1 (above), declare success and work with your blog community. Liza has done you a favor. You've been hoping to recruit Liza's feedback and her readers and you did. Now email all the speakers at the Personal Democracy Forum happening in your neck of the woods on May 15 and ask them to help you test the blog. A blog does not stand alone -- anymore than one talks with one's self, if one wishes to continue charging premium ad rates. So partner with other bloggers to work out the kinks -- if you know what I mean, and I think after covering your competition's "free form editorial experiments," that you do.

    Whatever you do, don't ignore Sabater's advice -- she's probably right, given some of the sensitivities at your organization, that she shouldn't have been able to log in and post just yet. Don't fail to take advantage of the fact that she has instalaunched your new blog. Don't, whatever you do, shut the thing down. Looks like the community might be as interested in this project as you are.

    For more on how to executive on Steps 1, 2 and 3, you can read the rest of my comments to the OJR, as well as the excellent insights of  Xeni Jardin, Chris Nolan and Bob Cauthorn, here.

    Tags: , , , , , Media, Journalism, News, Politics,

    Day One of BlogHer '06 Sells Out - Cocktail party still available

    Tags: , ,

    Elisa

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: Never, ever underestimate the tornado that is my colleague and BlogHer Co-Founder Elisa Camahort.

    Elisa, BlogHer's conference programming czarina, claims primary responsibility for this action-packed schedule for July 28. And as of today, we have sold every ticket we have for Day One of BlogHer '06, all 400 slots -- that's a good 100 more than we originally planned.

    If you don't yet have your ticket, you have a couple of options:

    Continue reading "Day One of BlogHer '06 Sells Out - Cocktail party still available" »

    Search Surfette


    Conferences and meet-ups

    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 09/2004

    Easier than you think

    Five-second therapy

    • Gail Sheehy
      "Women's liberation is not the end...it is the beginning of a lot of work. There is a whole world out there that needs to be totally transformed so that women and men can create, desire, build and play..."
    • Isabel Allende
      "The primary sex organ is the brain."

    July 2008

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31